Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Aggro | depian | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Red Deck Wins | latorretta | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Red Deck Wins | yukiro | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Red Deck Wins | kakashi_ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Red Deck Wins | csalles | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Big Red , Boros Aggro , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Convoke , Boros Mice , Goblins , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Cauldron , Gruul Counters
Witchstalker Frenzy ranks #266 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 78%).
Red average: 57.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Witchstalker Frenzy is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 11.90 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 68.6%. Witchstalker Frenzy has a win rate of 69.6%, making it 1.4% better than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 8 | 78.7% | 3 |
Demonic Ruckus | Enchantment — Aura | 11 | 72.9% | 4 |
Invasion of Tarkir | Battle — Siege | 5 | 65.9% | 0 |
Royal Treatment | Instant | 6 | 65.7% | 1 |
Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 26 | 63.4% | 7 |
Duress | Sorcery | 15 | 63.0% | 4 |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 13 | 62.1% | 4 |
Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 60.2% | 0 |
Magebane Lizard | Creature — Lizard | 23 | 58.7% | 3 |
Callous Sell-Sword | Creature — Human Soldier // Sorcery — Adventure | 18 | 56.2% | 6 |
Cards that perform better with Witchstalker Frenzy than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 1 | 7 | 83.8% | 69.3% | +14.5% |
Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 37 | 81.8% | 71.1% | +10.7% |
Into the Flood Maw | Instant | 1 | 21 | 83.2% | 73.0% | +10.2% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 10 | 81.0% | 71.0% | +10.0% |
Pawpatch Recruit | Creature — Rabbit Warrior | 1 | 9 | 78.7% | 68.8% | +9.8% |
Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 38 | 78.7% | 70.5% | +8.3% |
Sentinel of the Nameless City | Creature — Merfolk Warrior Scout | 3 | 9 | 75.9% | 68.6% | +7.4% |
Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 2 | 21 | 82.5% | 75.5% | +7.0% |
Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 38 | 77.6% | 70.7% | +7.0% |
Bounce Off | Instant | 1 | 12 | 82.7% | 77.0% | +5.6% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Red Deck Wins | 1194 | 88.4% | 53.7% |
Gruul Aggro | 1038 | 50.3% | 52.0% |
Boros Burn | 79 | 20.2% | 50.4% |
Izzet Spellslingers | 60 | 63.2% | 70.2% |
Gruul Delirium | 42 | 27.6% | 30.6% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.